Wednesday, May 6, 2020
Corporate Brand Image and Customer Satisfaction â⬠MyAssignmenthelp
Question: Discuss about the Corporate Brand Image and Customer Satisfaction. Answer: Introduction Starbucks Corporation is an American Coffee Company. It has well known position in the beverage and coffee industry. In the comparison of its competitors the revenue of the Starbucks has increased by 2% in 2017 (CSI market, 2017). Porters five forces model is aided an organization to evaluate the position of the company. The position of the company in terms of substitute products and services are defined below. Threat of substitute takes place when companies are forced to compete within same industry produced substitute products and services. The range of substitute product is high for the Starbucks brand coffee. The characteristics of Starbucks are availability of substitutes, low switching cost and low cost of substitute. This element of five forces model depicts that substitute have firm potential to negatively influence of Starbucks. There is possible chance that the customer of Starbucks can easily switch from one place to another due to availability of substitute of coffee in the market ( Magretta, 2011). The shifting cost of substitute is low because the customers of Starbucks are not required to spend for the purpose of shifting. Another threat source for Starbucks is homemade products which can provide the facility many customers to make at home. Apart from that the efficient customer service, excellent ambience and premium quality in coffee, Starbucks provides premium packaged cof fee and coffee makers to its customers. The brand loyalty and efficient quality of products and services are able to extent the threat of substitutes. Position of the company in term of customer The bargaining power of customer or buyers of Starbucks is moderate to low. Although the customers of the Starbucks are getting premium quality in coffee but there is a possibility that many of them can move to another brand if they get premium quality in low cost (Cheng 2013). There are so many substitutes available of the products of Starbucks which can force customer to have other brands beverages and switch from it to another. The power of buyer is affected by number of availability of products in the market. It has been analyzed that the product mix of Starbucks is diverse. Customers are attractive towards the brand of coffee which is provided by Starbucks. Thus, the aspect of force model of porters defines that the customers are precious for Starbucks but there is a possible chance that the other brand might get attract of its customers by providing low cost beverages. The business model of Starbucks contains 9 models which aids it to do something innovative with its products and services. The description of business model of Starbucks is mentioned below. Starbucks is possessing approximately 20,000 stores worldwide inclusive of Starbucks Coffee, Teavana, Seattles Coffee development of renewed retail locations (Geereddy, 2013). The target customer of Starbucks is men and women aged 25 to 40. The size of the organization is wider and Starbucks is establishing itself in present as well as future market as well by opning its store in all over the world. It secures reliable customers trust and preserve market share as well. The first Starbucks was opened in Washington in 1971 by three partners. Gordon Bowker, Jerry Baldwin and Zev Siegl were founder of Starbucks Company (Mason, Cole Goza, 2017). The competitors of the Starbucks are McDonalds, Costa Coffee and Dunkins Donuts. In the context of marketing and sales, Starbucks focuses on the premium high quality items and upper level of client administration (Garthwaite, et. al., 2017). The technology development of Starbucks is remarkable because it provides the premium quality and maintain s the consistency in the flavour and menu to connect with the customers for a long time (Tu, Wang and Chang, 2012). Conclusion It has been recommended that the Starbucks are popular brand for the coffee. Apart from the positive aspects there are some major challenges such as low cost products by competitive brands, higher prices of coffee beans and variety in the food provided by the competitors who may impact the Starbucks adversely. It has been recommended that it should operate its business as per analysing and evaluating the demand of customers. References Cheng, D.S. (2013). Analyze the hotel industry in porter five competitive forces.Journal of Global Business Management,9(3), p.52. CSI market. (2017). SBUX Sales vs. its Competitors Q2 2017, Retrieved fromhttps://csimarket.com/stocks/compet_glance.php?code=SBUX. DaSilva, C. M., Trkman, P. (2014). Business model: what it is and what it is not.Long range planning,47(6), 379-389. Garthwaite, C., Garthwaite, C., Busse, M., Busse, M., Brown, J., Brown, J., Merkley, G. (2017). Starbucks: A Story of Growth.Kellogg School of Management Cases, 1-20. Magretta, J., (2011).Understanding Michael Porter: The essential guide to competition and strategy. Harvard business press. Mason, A., Cole, T., Goza, N. (2017). Starbucks: a case study of effective management in the coffee industry.Journal of International Management Studies,17(1). Tu, Y.T., Wang, C.M. and Chang, H.C. (2012). Corporate brand image and customer satisfaction on loyalty: An empirical study of Starbucks coffee in Taiwan.Journal of Social and Development Sciences,3(1), pp.24-32.
Tuesday, May 5, 2020
Blindness in Carverââ¬â¢s ââ¬ÅCathedralââ¬Â free essay sample
Abstract Raymond Carver, being a famous American short story writer in the 20th century, was often labeled as a minimalist writer. However, his ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠was nothing like his previous stories. With no extraneous words, Carver expressed his unique worldview and vision in ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠. This essay will examine the text from four different perspectives: sight and insight, names and downplay of individuality, dialogues between characters, and the growth of narrator, which are all related to the theme ââ¬Å"blindnessâ⬠and all contribute to the fulfillment of the workââ¬â¢s artistic and literary value. Keywords Raymond Carver ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠Sight and Insight Downplay of Individuality Dialogue Growth of Narrator ââ¬Å"Which stories are your favorites? â⬠When the French literary journalist Claude Grimal interviewed Raymond Carver in the spring of 1987, Carver responded to this question with the answer ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠. Raymond Carver was a debatable American short story writer in the Reagan era. He was often labeled as a minimalist writer by his contemporary critics, which he rejected in several interviews. Yet, ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠was nothing like the ââ¬Å"minimalistâ⬠stories Carver wrote before. According to Lehman, ââ¬Å"ââ¬ËCathedralââ¬â¢ is a vastly different story from any that are collected in What We Talk About When We Talk About Love, but not because its theory of significant facts has changed. The distinction is that characterization and plots are expanded, while Carver, on occasion, allows himself an optimistic vision that seemed impossible for him to express earlier. â⬠Even Carver admitted that himself in his interview with the French literary journalist Claude Grimal: ââ¬Å"The story ââ¬ËCathedralââ¬â¢ seemed to me completely different from everything Id written before. â⬠The idea of the story was inspired by a blind friend of Carverââ¬â¢s wife Tess Gallagher. Just like in the story, the blind friend of Carverââ¬â¢s wife came to visit them after his wifeââ¬â¢s death. And this real blind friend of Gallagher Jerry Carriveau was the prototype of the blind man Robert in ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠. Carverââ¬â¢s stories often start with something real and he revealed this in the 1983 interview for The Paris Review: ââ¬Å"But thereââ¬â¢s always something, some element, something said to me or that I witnessed, that may be the starting placeâ⬠(Carver Country, 51). It was often commented that Carverââ¬â¢s earlier stories were written for the blue-collar. However, we can hardly find any such traces in the story ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠. It mainly focuses on the narratorââ¬â¢s change and growth (Interview with Claude Grimal), through the inspiration from the blind man. Thus, ââ¬Å"blindnessâ⬠is especially important in this story. In the short story ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠, the word ââ¬Å"blindâ⬠has appeared 80 times. ââ¬Å"Blindnessâ⬠is the key theme which causes the narratorââ¬â¢s change and growth. In the following passage, I will examine the text from four different perspectives: sight and insight, name and downplay of individuality, dialogues between characters, and the growth of narrator, which are all derived from the key theme ââ¬Å"blindnessâ⬠. 1. Sight and Insight Blindness serves as an important feature of the wifeââ¬â¢s old friend Robert and also the theme of the story. However what Carver wanted to show was not only physical blindness, he wanted to show the difference between sight and insight. The author gave effort to stress the feature of Robert repetitively so as to express the narratorââ¬â¢s discomfort and discrimination against blindness. In the first paragraph, the narrator expressed his stereotypical view towards ââ¬Å"blindnessâ⬠: ââ¬Å"My idea of blindness came from the movies. In the movies, the blind moved slowly and never laughedâ⬠(Fiction 100, 123). In the following plot, every activity the narrator did with Robert was a new experience because Robert was physically blind and it was the narratorââ¬â¢s first contact with a blind man. From chatting, smoking, drinking, eating to watching television, Carver had deliberately chosen these activities to show Robertââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"blindnessâ⬠and described in detail Robertââ¬â¢s reactions and the narratorââ¬â¢s responses. When the three of us were having dinner, the narrator particularly paid attention to Robertââ¬â¢s action: ââ¬Å"The blind man had right away located his foods, he knew just where everything was on his plate. â⬠Yet the narrator had no idea that being able to look is different from being able to see. The narrator had sight but he lacked insight. He could not understand his wife and he knew little about his wifeââ¬â¢s past. When Robert and the narratorââ¬â¢s wife were chatting about the past ten years, the narrator could not cut in and talked as well. He could simply sit aside and pretended that he was not interested. He did not take time to understand his wife and his miscommunication with his wife will be further discussed in the third section of the thesis. On the contrary, Robert was understanding and insightful. He supported the narratorââ¬â¢s wife when she most needed comfort and security. Robert took the initiative, asking the narratorââ¬â¢s wife to send him tapes telling him about her life. He took the effort and time to listen and responded by sending back another tape to her. It continued for ten years. The audiotapes between Robert and the narratorââ¬â¢s wife served as an effective communication channel. They had kept their friendship for all those years while being physically so far away. However the narrator did not pay attention to his wifeââ¬â¢s personal life. When he was hearing the audiotape with his wife, a knock on the door interrupted and he never got back to hear the tape, totally ignoring Robertââ¬â¢s possibly influencing comments on himself. When Robert finally visited the narrator in person, they could eventually have a genuine dialogue when his wife was asleep. As Robert could not watch the television with his own eyes, the narrator gave some verbal accounts of what the television was showing. The narratorââ¬â¢s inability to describe the cathedral with his words to Robert shows the failure of language. Trussler analyzed Carverââ¬â¢s another story ââ¬Å"Why Donââ¬â¢t You Dance? â⬠with the conclusion that it is ââ¬Å"a contemporary fable that underscores the difficulty of producing meaning through narrationâ⬠. In this case, the narrator had difficulty in producing meaning from his description of cathedrals. It also shows the narratorââ¬â¢s inability to ââ¬Å"seeâ⬠things. He did not have insight for anything and that was why he could not describe the cathedral. He knew nothing about religion and so he could not give accounts about the religious architecture. He could only utter certain adjectives to describe the architecture: ââ¬Å"tallâ⬠, ââ¬Å"bigâ⬠, ââ¬Å"massiveâ⬠. He even repeated the phrase ââ¬Å"In those olden daysâ⬠twice in his second attempt to describe the cathedral, implying that he could not find words to express what he wanted to say. It was the blind man who eventually helped the narrator to discover a new realm of knowing the things he took for granted. He asked the narrator to draw a cathedral on a heavy paper. The roles of the narrator and Robert had switched at that moment. Normally, it should be the one who could see to tell what a cathedral was like. However in this case, it was the blind man who guided the narrator on how to feel the world. ââ¬Å"His fingers rode my fingers as my hand went over the paperâ⬠(Fiction 100, 132). The blind man had shared his worldview with the narrator by working with the narrator to complete the drawing of a cathedral. In the last scene, when Robert told the narrator to open his eyes and take a look at the drawing, the narrator still closed his eyes. He was enjoying his epiphanic moment in recognizing the world with a different feeling: ââ¬Å"Itââ¬â¢s really somethingâ⬠(Fiction 100, 133). 2. Names and Downplay of Individuality Blindness is not the only theme of the story, the seldom use of names in ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠is worth noted as well. There are three main characters in the story. Yet until the end of the story, we readers only know that the blind manââ¬â¢s name was Robert. We do not know the names of the narrator and his wife. Strange enough, we know from the interlude the name of Robertââ¬â¢s dead wife: Beulah. Though the narrator had known Robertââ¬â¢s name all along, he did not call him by his name, but by his disability: ââ¬Å"the blind manâ⬠. We seldom saw the narrator addressing Robert by his name in the story. It was always his wife who called Robert by his name in the dialogues. The dismissal of using a name for the major characters in the story signifies Carverââ¬â¢s intention to downplay the individuality of the characters, further focusing on the physical feature of the characters: the blindness of Robert, the femininity of the narratorââ¬â¢s wife. It also shows the narratorââ¬â¢s superficial attitude towards people. Carver adopted the first-person point of view and enhanced the realistic feeling of reading the story. Readers can directly get in touch with the superficial and judgmental character of the narrator from his frank narration. The narratorââ¬â¢s wife was never mentioned by her own name. The narrator simply called her ââ¬Å"my wifeâ⬠. Before she became the narratorââ¬â¢s wife, she was another personââ¬â¢s wife: ââ¬Å"an Air Force officerââ¬â¢s wifeâ⬠(Fiction 100, 124). She was not given her own individuality but only the identity as someoneââ¬â¢s wife: ââ¬Å"She told him that she was writing a poem about what it was like to be an Air Force officerââ¬â¢s wifeâ⬠(Fiction 100, 124). Even his wifeââ¬â¢s ex-husband did not have a name: ââ¬Å"Her officerââ¬âwhy should he have a name? he was the childhood sweetheart, and what more does he want? â⬠(Fiction 100, 124) The narrator just called his wifeââ¬â¢s ex-husband ââ¬Å"my wifeââ¬â¢s officerâ⬠. It can be interpreted that the narrator was self-centered and self-absorbed, caring only those relating to himself. The narrator did not respect others, therefore he did not address people by their names, but only by their most distinguished features. In Robertââ¬â¢s case, it was ââ¬Å"blindnessâ⬠. Robertââ¬â¢s name was only mentioned four times in the story by the narrator, except in dialogues and through his wifeââ¬â¢s mouth. The name ââ¬Å"Robertâ⬠was first mentioned in the third-to-last sentence of the sixteenth paragraph, before the narratorââ¬â¢s wife officially introduced Robert to him face to face. We can deduce that the narrator had known Robertââ¬â¢s name all along, even before Robert had arrived at their house. However, the narrator chose to address Robert as ââ¬Å"the blind manâ⬠throughout the whole story. It can be considered an attempt of stressing the theme ââ¬Å"blindnessâ⬠and Carverââ¬â¢s effort to underplay Robertââ¬â¢s individuality. Robertââ¬â¢s dead wife also had a name: Beulah. But it was only mentioned because the name could show that the woman was a colored woman. ââ¬Å"Beulah! Thatââ¬â¢s a name for a colored womanâ⬠(Fiction 100, 124). The narrator immediately exclaimed after he knew the name of Robertââ¬â¢s wife. He even took the step to ask his wife if Beulah was ââ¬Å"a Negroâ⬠. Thus, it can be inferred that Carver meant to reveal the narratorââ¬â¢s judgmental nature through mentioning the name ââ¬Å"Beulahâ⬠. The name was used for the purpose of exclusion. The name of the narrator is unknown. His wife did not address him by his name in any dialogue she had with her husband. Even when she introduced the narrator to Robert, she did not give her husbandââ¬â¢s name, but only said ââ¬Å"this is my husbandâ⬠(Fiction 100, 125). I regard this writing technique as Carverââ¬â¢s effort of downplaying the charactersââ¬â¢ identity and individuality. The narrator does not only represent himself but also the group of people who are judgmental and discriminative. The narratorââ¬â¢s wife represents another group of people who are kind and open-minded, willing to accept people with disabilities. Although Robert and Beulah were addressed by their names in the story, Beulah was a minor character and Robertââ¬â¢s name was not always mentioned. The narrator addressed Robert as ââ¬Å"the blind manâ⬠more often, suggesting physical deficiency than personality. 3. Dialogues between Characters Although the physical deficiency of Robert is much emphasized in the story, the personality of Robert can be brought out in dialogues. Dialogues are essential in Carverââ¬â¢s stories. As he stated in the 1987 interview with Claude Grimal, he considered dialogues important: ââ¬Å"It ought to advance the plot or illuminate character. â⬠In ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠, dialogues have more significance in his other stories. Since Robert was blind, his communication with either the narrator or his wife could only through conversations. Consequently, dialogues are of great impact on the storyââ¬â¢s development. The dialogues in ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠can be divided into three categories: between the narrator and his wife; between the narrator, his wife and Robert; and between the narrator and Robert. We can notice that the narrator had some miscommunication with his wife. Since Robert was his wifeââ¬â¢s friend and he himself was a discriminative person, he could not possibly speak out how he felt disturbed by a visit from a blind man. Therefore the narrator began his dialogue with his wife with ââ¬Å"Maybe I could take him bowlingâ⬠(Fiction 100, 124), which was not even a reasonable suggestion for a blind man. The narrator was trying to act nice and was testing how his wife would respond. His wife could feel his unwillingness and responded by extending the topic to his love toward her, further convincing her husband that it was just ordinary to treat a friend. If he especially took it out to discuss, it would be unnecessary. Then the narrator rebutted that he did not have any blind friends. He implied that he was just consulting if it was a good idea to take the blind man to bowling. When the narrator asked if Robertââ¬â¢s wife was ââ¬Å"a Negroâ⬠, his wife could no longer stand his judgmental comment and could only replied ââ¬Å"Are you crazy? Are you drunk? â⬠, indicating a communication gap here. The wife did not realize that her husband was narrow-minded. She expected that her husband would welcome Robert as his friend as well. The narrator was still mindful of his wifeââ¬â¢s ambiguous relationship with Robert in the past ten years. He did not just feel uncomfortable about Robertââ¬â¢s being blind, but also Robertââ¬â¢s close relationship with his wife. When Robert and the narrator first encountered, Robert felt at ease and tried to make a connection with the narrator. It was the narrator who wanted to distance himself. He said ââ¬Å"Welcomeâ⬠to Robert, assuring that he was the owner of the house and that he was the host of Robert. During the narratorââ¬â¢s presence, his wife maintained a close relationship with Robert as well. Robert called the narratorââ¬â¢s wife ââ¬Å"my dearâ⬠and ââ¬Å"they talked about the major things that had come to pass for them in the past ten yearsâ⬠(Fiction 100, 127). The narrator started to feel better about Robert after dinner, awed by Robertââ¬â¢s ability to manage his life so well even though he was blind. He tried to address Robert by his name thrice in the paragraph. However, he felt left out since the two of them exchanged their previous experience and the narrator felt like the only outsider. Only when the narratorââ¬â¢s wife was asleep could the two men have a chance to talk to each other. One thing worth taking note of is the way Robert addressed the narrator, calling him ââ¬Å"bubâ⬠. According to Cambridge Dictionaries Online, ââ¬Å"bubâ⬠is a form of address used to a man, sometimes in a slightly angry way. Within the context, there is no reason for Robert to be angry with the narrator. It can be regarded as an intimate address to the narrator, or a spark of contempt, implying that he was older and more experienced than the narrator. We can tell that the narrator did not like it. He exclaimed ââ¬Å"Bub! â⬠when he first heard Robert calling him that. After the narrator failed to describe the cathedral to Robert, his legs ââ¬Å"felt like they didnââ¬â¢t have any strength in themâ⬠(Fiction 100, 131). Feeling powerless in front of a blind man, the narrator lost all confidence. It was Robert who encouraged the narrator: ââ¬Å"Terrific. Youââ¬â¢re doing fineâ⬠(Fiction 100, 132). The dialogues between the three major characters reveal their relationship and their change of relationship. At first, the narrator was irritated by Robertââ¬â¢s visit. He did not welcome Robert as he said. Then after much contact with Robert, the narrator started to change his views toward blind people because his stereotypes did not match with Robert. Yet he did not want to admit that he was wrong in judging people. After his spiritual communication with Robert, he actually changed and was able to view the world with a different perspective. 4. Growth of Narrator The growth of the narrator in ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠is something new in Carverââ¬â¢s stories. ââ¬Å"Id never written a story like that. â⬠Carver explained in his interview with Claude Grimal when he admitted that the narrator changed and grew in the story. Only with the appearance of the blind man Robert, the narrator could realize that he lacked in-depth thinking and he could not even do the job of describing a cathedral to a blind man. Robert, though being physically blind, rescued the narrator by opening his eyes to the new dimension of life, understanding the nature of things more in depth. In the beginning of the story, the narrator was a typical white man, feeling superior to colored people, judgmental towards the disabled ones. He tried not to show it explicitly in his narration but he admitted that he was not happy about Robertââ¬â¢s visit: ââ¬Å"I wasnââ¬â¢t enthusiastic about his visitâ⬠¦. And his being blind bothered meâ⬠¦. A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward toâ⬠(Fiction 100, 123). He was jealous of the ambiguous relationship between Robert and his wife too, especially when he knew that Robert ââ¬Å"touched his fingers to every part of her face, her noseââ¬âeven her neckâ⬠(Fiction 100, 123). He was bothered by the fact that his wife treated Robertââ¬â¢s touching as ââ¬Å"something really important had happened to herâ⬠(Fiction 100, 123). As a result, the narrator had a repulsive feeling towards Robert. He treated Robert as a stranger, ââ¬Å"this blind man I didnââ¬â¢t even know! â⬠(Fiction 100, 124) Those stereotypes he had for blind people were not realistic because he hadnââ¬â¢t met a blind man before. ââ¬Å"A beard on a blind man! Too much, I say. â⬠(Fiction 100, 125) He was pretentious, acting as a person whom he was not in front of Robert. Before they had their dinner, he led the prayer. His wife was most surprised and ââ¬Å"her mouth agapeâ⬠. We can tell that the narrator and his wife had no such habit as praying before meals. The prayer was not a prayer at all. No addresses of gods or requests for blessings in the prayer. The prayer was secular: ââ¬Å"Pray the phone wonââ¬â¢t ring and food doesnââ¬â¢t get coldâ⬠(Fiction 100, 127). The way the narrator talked about the marriage between Beulah and Robert was not without traces of contempt and disdain. When he spoke of the wedding of Beulah and Robert, he interrupted with a question: ââ¬Å"whoââ¬â¢d want to go to such a wedding in the first place? Inferring his scorn for the couple. Being more scornful, he even repeated his wifeââ¬â¢s word ââ¬Å"inseparableâ⬠in italics. He even made fun of Robertââ¬â¢s disability to picture the scene of Beulahââ¬â¢s death for entertainment, imagining Robertââ¬â¢s blind eyes with tears running and Beulah regretting that Robert had never seen her face dying. However, the narrator gradually discovered that Robert was beyond his expectations. Robert acted as if he could see and could take care of himself very well. He began to respect Robert and invited him to smoke marijuana with him. The relationship between the two men began to get closer and friendlier. In the last part, the narrator even cared for Robertââ¬â¢s needs and asked if he knew what a cathedral looked like. He tried hard to describe a cathedral to Robert not only because of his pride of being able to see, but also because of his supposed superiority over blind people, the so-called ââ¬Å"responsibilityâ⬠to take care of the needy and weak. Yet it turned out that the narrator was the one who needed help. Although Robert was physically handicapped, he was spiritually satisfied. For the narrator, he was physically well conditioned but he lacked spiritual fulfillment. Like what he answered Robert, he was not religious and he did not believe in anything. But when he followed Robertââ¬â¢s guidance to draw out a cathedral, and closed his eyes to feel, he reached a transcendental moment: ââ¬Å"Itââ¬â¢s really somethingâ⬠(Fiction 100, 133). What the ââ¬Å"somethingâ⬠is we do not know exactly, but it is no doubt that the narrator had changed his views and probably opened up his mind with the help of a blind man. ââ¬Å"In Carver there is a prevailing absence, a silence, an empty space between the lines that his texts invite us to fillâ⬠(Reading Raymond Carver, 1). Carver did not overtly tell us anything in the story ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠. We can interpret it in many ways. For me, Carver had created his ââ¬Å"Carverian worldâ⬠in ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠, or in Gallagherââ¬â¢s words ââ¬Å"Carver Countryâ⬠. People are divided into two groups: prejudiced versus non-prejudiced; disabled versus good and healthy, whether physically or spiritually. However, no matter which group you belong to, there is always something to learn from the other group. ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠is a short story but it is embedded with important themes. Blindness advances the plot and brings out the ultimate epiphany scene of the narrator, enlightening both the character and the readers. The downplaying of individuality by the rare use of names is also worth discussed. Carver introduced a personal account of story and it is universally applicable. Dialogues serve as the indicator of the relationship between the characters and witness the change of relationship, especially between Robert and the narrator. Through the verbal interactions, we are able to know more about the feelings and attitudes of the characters. The growth of the narrator is what Carver wanted to show in this particular story. In his earlier stories, Carver seldom introduced such an idea. Different from his previous writing habit, that is secluding himself in his room, he drafted ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠on a train paralleling the Hudson River, the very train that Jerry Carriveau, the prototype of Robert had taken from New York City for their reunion (Carver Country, 15). This newly added idea sheds some optimistic light on the work itself. In 1982 a question-and-answer session at the University of Akron, Carver said, ââ¬Å"This is a farfetched analogy, but itââ¬â¢s in a way like building a fantastic cathedral. The main thing is to get the work of art together. You donââ¬â¢t know who built those cathedrals, but theyââ¬â¢re thereâ⬠(Reading Raymond Carver, 185). ââ¬Å"Cathedralâ⬠is not only a great piece of literary work with simple language, but also a work of art with profound themes and a new vision. Works Cited
Wednesday, April 15, 2020
MTH302 Final Term Solved Papers by Moaaz
MTH302 Final Term Solved Papers by MoaazFor many years, MTH302 Final Term Solved Papers by Moaaz has been a staple of any student's course. Just about everyone can attest to the book's popularity because it has been recommended and praised for so many years now. And that popularity comes from the unique teaching methods it employs that will satisfy the requirements of both high school students and college students.MTH302 Final Term Solved Papers by Moaaz is not just about learning equations and solving them; it is more of an interactive approach to a number of problems. You will not learn just how to use the calculator or find roots of polynomials but you will also learn how to solve your own homework problems. There are often other ways of figuring out equations that will help you develop your analytical skills as well. You can practice this type of teaching at home and really enjoy using it.With the introduction of new software, people get lost in the process of using new software to learn mathematics. However, many teachers and professors still hold back from teaching the advantages of this approach because they do not want to involve their students in mathematical concepts they might be afraid of. This is exactly why Moaaz takes such pains to explain its methods in detail to make you familiar with it.A word of caution: while MTH302 Final Term Solved Papers by Moaaz is used mainly in the United States, the book does have similar appeal outside the country. This book may not be available for purchase in your language. That is understandable, because there are just too many countries to offer up the necessary readership.MTH302 Final Term Solved Papers by Moaaz may seem daunting at first glance. If you are not sure what these books are all about, you should try to gain some understanding of how they are taught and why it is effective. The book is structured in a way that makes it easy for you to follow.When you are reading it, you will find that the steps are a lways in the same order because the approach it takes is the same as the way you learned math in school. When you learn math using methods that do not seem to be as efficient or compelling as the way your teachers teach it, you are likely to become bored. You may even stop attending classes altogether. That is why Moaaz takes the time to explain the ways the book works.Once you read MTH302 Final Term Solved Papers by Moaaz, you will find that it does not fall into the trap of presenting ways to solve problems in a single approach. You learn to solve problems on different levels. By trying out each level before moving on to the next, you will discover that this book will truly motivate you to work harder.Finally, MTH302 Final Term Solved Papers by Moaaz will provide you with an efficient method of learning. You can learn better by doing than just reading or listening to someone explain it. In fact, Moaaz will allow you to practice using math software that is designed to improve your skills in math by allowing you to improve the skills you already have.
Tuesday, April 14, 2020
20 Exploratory Essay Topics Meet the Variety of Ideas on Cultural Capital
20 Exploratory Essay Topics Meet the Variety of Ideas on Cultural Capital Cultural capital is a set of tangible and intangible assets that allow us power and social mobility. Cultural capital ensures that we could rise up the social ladder without having to worry about acquiring financial capital. There are countless aspects of culture capital that are worth discussing in an exploratory essay. Here are some of our top picks: Cultural Capital and Its Link to Social and Human Capital Is New York the Cultural Capital of the World? The Connection between Cultural Capital and Social Classes Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment Cultural Capital in Comparison to Other Forms of Knowledge Cultural Capital vs. Economic Capital Cultural Capital vs. Social Capital Cultural Capital and Its Impact on an Individualââ¬â¢s Health Cultural Capital and School Success: The Case of South Korea Examples of Cultural Capital Technology as a Cultural Capital Impacts of Cultural Capital on Student College Choice Process in China Cultural Capital and Graduate Student Success Cultural Capital and Power Circularity Can Colleges Build Cultural Capital? Creating Cultural Capital within the Nation Cultural Capital in the Field of Sports Cultural Well-Being Created Through Cultural Capital The State of Cultural Capital of Britain Today New Forms of Cultural Capital Sample Exploratory Essay on the Connection between Cultural Capital and Social Classes Cultural capital has been described and discussed in depth by Pierre Bourdieu. According to him, there are three parts to cultural capital: institutionalized, objectified and embodied cultural capital. Bourdieu also mentions that embodied cultural capital is divided as per three social classes: working class, middle class and upper class. Corresponding to a recent survey conducted by Alice Sullivan, cultural capital is acquired within oneââ¬â¢s home, which in turn helps the individual achieve success. The first step of success is often gaining sufficient educational credentials. However, it seems that according to Bourdieu, different social classes have different degrees of education attainment. Unfortunately, this point has been stressed by many experts since then. This is problematic, since everybody deserves an equal chance of being educated and achieving success in the future. However, this gap in educational attainment can only be fixed one level at a time. The article written by Pierre Bourdieu that focused on cultural capital was issued in 1986. Along with him, many others have discussed how different social classes had varying cultural capital. This is worrisome in several ways; while one problem is related to education, others are connected to matters such as health. Pertaining to the education sector, over the decades it has been discussed how a fraction of pupils are underachievers, which is blamed on their lack of cultural capital such as etiquettes, manners, etc. Other experts have discussed how parents that have less cultural capital make decisions that are different from parents with higher cultural capital. For instance, working class parents do not educate their children as much as upper class parents. Furthermore, the working class generally cannot provide their children with supplies to aid in better education. Another example is that individuals from the working or middle class make different health choices, when compared to individuals from the upper class. I believe that our current generation and the future ones are in dire need of equality in terms of education, to achieve economic capital and help in eliminating poverty altogether. There are several ways in which all social classes could have the same level of education. For instance, institutes could try to promote education in all social classes. They could provide technology to every student in order to better educate them; a group of students having access to a computer and the Internet will have better knowledge than a group that does not have them. After doing some heavy research, I have found that many institutes wish to promote cultural capital within the students. As a matter of fact, early education is said to be promoted only to enhance the cultural capital in of the children. This sounds very promising in terms of producing better, knowledge-equipped batches of high school graduates, undergraduates and post-graduate students in the future. Not only will these students know how to be successful, they will also know how to make better choices regarding their health. Additionally, they will share their knowledge with others around them, in turn creating a better world to live in. References: Jennifer, S. (2012). New York, Cultural Capital of the World? Discuss. Alice, S. Nuffield College Oxford. Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment. Prudence L. Carter. Harvard University. ââ¬Å"Blackâ⬠Cultural Capital, Status Positioning, and Schooling Conflicts for Low-Income African American Youth. John H. Goldthorpe. ââ¬Å"Cultural Capitalâ⬠: Some Critical Observations. Lawrence E. Harrison. (2013). Jews, Confucians, and Protestants: Cultural Capital and the End of Multiculturism. Johanna L. Waters. (2008). Education, Migration, and Cultural Capital in the Chinese Diaspora. Arnd-Michael Nohl, Karin Schittenhelm, Oliver Schmidtke and Anja Weib. (2014). Work in Transition: Cultural Capital and Highly Skilled Migrantsââ¬â¢ Passages into the Labour Market.
Monday, April 13, 2020
Essay on Abuse in College - Important Tips to Write About Abuse in College
Essay on Abuse in College - Important Tips to Write About Abuse in CollegeHave you recently been asked to write an essay on the subject of abuse in college? This can be quite a stressful task for anyone who is not familiar with writing. Abuse is something that is very traumatic for the person that has experienced it. They may not be able to talk about what happened for fear of being misunderstood or they may be afraid that what happened will eventually affect them throughout their life.This can really affect a person's ability to do their best during their career or to perform well in any social situation. When people are in a position where they are making decisions about someone's life, they are going to be held accountable for their actions. If there is something that they did that negatively affected another person, they are going to be responsible for it. One way to avoid being made to feel guilty about what you did is to have the ability to defend yourself against a claim that was made.It is important to understand how to prepare for an assignment when it comes to writing an essay on abuse in college. This can be something that can be quite a challenge for most people to handle. You will want to keep in mind that there is no right or wrong answer when it comes to essay writing on this topic. Instead, you should focus on learning about your topic in order to learn what to write about in the essay.One of the first things that you need to do is research the topic of the essay. You should read as much as you can about the subject of abuse in college. This will help you develop your own unique perspective on the subject and be able to put your information in a way that makes sense to you. If you are not familiar with the subject matter that you are working on, you can still research it but be sure to pick up some different resources to use.Try to avoid using references that might be incorrect. You should also avoid using multiple sources that say different thi ngs about the topic. For example, if you are writing an essay on abuse in college you may want to include the opinions of a few different people. If the information in these sources is not reliable, you should rely on other information that you have read.Try to avoid adding one opinion to the other. The facts should be the most important things that you include in the essay. These should be the only information that you include in the essay. Anything else that you include is just going to take away from the information that you already have.Do not make the mistake of just trying to write an essay on abuse in college. As mentioned earlier, you should be able to research the topic and come up with a unique viewpoint on the topic. This should give you a good chance to make an essay that is both informative and valuable to others.In order to have success with an essay on abuse in college, you should always strive to come up with a unique viewpoint on the topic. You should also be able t o provide your readers with information that is useful and accurate. You should then have the ability to show that you took the time to research the topic.
Saturday, April 11, 2020
How You Can Read And Discuss Election Research Paper Topics
How You Can Read And Discuss Election Research Paper TopicsThe decisions of the politicians and the leaders are made based on the research papers they read and write down in the elections research papers. All the countries which have their own elections will do this as well. The decisions taken are based on the research paper that is written by them and is presented to the voters, for them to decide on the issues that are important.The countries who have their own elections are required to give their information in writing. This information is usually given by the president or the chief minister of the country who will present the research paper to the electorate and they will decide upon what is most important to the country and what needs to be done. Once this research paper is out there, the media goes all over it to get the people of the country involved and to discuss about it and how it is presented. It is quite easy to find a talk show on any TV channel with a one hour time sl ot just to discuss about the election and its candidates.Any person who is not interested in politics can comment on this information. Any person who is interested in it can also discuss it openly about what the pros and cons are of the issues that were discussed in the election. The other option would be to go to a newspaper or to a political news channel for their views.Election research paper topics vary according to the countries where elections are held. A country like India is the worst candidate to decide about the final outcome of the elections because the democracies are highly democratic. Any issue that might affect the democratic system and the elections of the country, such as the death of the king or queen, will be discussed in the debate. The difference between democracies and republics is that in a democracy you vote for a particular candidate who will represent you and the next thing you know you have a democratic government.To put it in simple words, any democracy i n the world will debate on any issue because they will not compromise on the right of the people to choose the leader of the country. In a republic, elections will be held depending on the will of the people and they can choose to either vote or not to vote. But this will be decided by the people.But in all countries which are considered to be good democracies, they will discuss a lot about the policies of the government. In this case the debate will be about the ways of development of the country. This has become a part of any election campaign in every country. Therefore they have to study about the other policies and the benefits and the disadvantages of the policies.Thus there are a lot of research paper topics in elections which can be discussed. Every country that is going to hold an election will need to discuss the policy of the government and the party which are going to win the elections.
Thursday, March 12, 2020
Alexander Hamilton - Federalist papers 78, 79, 80, 81 essays
Alexander Hamilton - Federalist papers 78, 79, 80, 81 essays Alexander Hamilton, author of numbers 78, 79, 80, and 81 of the Federalist Papers, justifies the specific provisions of Section 1 of Article 3 of the Constitution by defending his views on the Judiciary. He also explains some points that were hard to comprehend, more thoroughly, along with his view on the role of the Supreme Court. Tenure, when used by Mr. Hamilton, means in short, the occupancy of a seat on the Supreme Court for a Justice. This is to make clear that a Supreme Court Justice is not guaranteed a seat for life. Article 3, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution states, The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour... The most important part of this statement is as I underlined good Behaviour because this justifies what tenure means in Mr. Hamiltons Federalist Paper number 78. Supreme Court Justices are appointed for life but it is not guaranteed. They must not break the law, and they must follow all of the rules and regulations that a court justice must follow. If not, they are capable of being impeached. The other half of Article 3, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution ... and shall, at Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office. This is explained by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers number 79. He states The salaries of judicial officers may from time to time be altered, as occasion shall require, yet so as never to lessen the allowance with which any particular judge comes into office, in respect to him... But with regard to the judges, who, if they behave properly, will be secured in their places for life... Mr. Hamilton is justifying the guidelines of fixed salaries for a federal judge. He is stating that as time passes, things change and the economy will be stronger. Since this is bound to happen, judges will be paid...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)