Tuesday, March 26, 2019

Financial Analysis: PepsiCo Beats Coca-Cola Essay -- Pepsi, Coke, busi

Pepsi vs. Coke the epic battle that every American and from the timbers of their pecuniary statements possibly everyone in the world must deal with does it have a winner. For the fiscal yr 2005 it certainly does through analyzing financial statements with vertical, horizontal, and ratio show upline investors are able to clearly decide who the better choice for their investing is. By careful scruitiny and attention to detail any investor can safely put their money in a buiseness as an investment so long as they are adhering to rules and regulations of the GAAP. Using the tools for financial summary and the data given I will determine the winner of that battle for 2005 at least from the investors point of view. In our literature it states that a vertical analysis evaluates financial statement data by expressing each item in a financial statement as a percent of a base amount. I chose to look vertically at current assets and liabilities, of twain companies so I can compa re these figures between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo to find out who is in better current standing. occurrent assets Vs. Total Assets for PepsiCo( 2005)10454/ 31727 = approx. 33% of keep down assets are current (2004)8639/ 27987 = approx. 31% of ingrained assets are current at a time we will look at the current liabilities vs. total liabilities for PepsiCo(2005)9406/ 17476 = approx. 54% of the total liabilities are current (2004)6752/ 14464 = approx. 47% of the total liabilities are current Current assets Vs. Total Assets for Coca-Cola2005)10250/ 29427 =Approx. 35% Current2004)12281/ 31441 = Approx 39% CurrentAnd we will look at the current liabilities vs. total liabilities for Coca-Cola2005)9836/ 29427 = Approx. 33% Current 2004... ...id volume product for 2005The caller-out said it earned $864 million, or 36 cents a share, in the fourth quarter, a 28 percent drop from the year before. However, excluding one-time charges, the follow earned 46 cents per share, a penny ahead of a nalysts expectations. One-time items included taxes on repatriated foreign earnings and a charge related to a bottling investment.(Wilbert, 06) It is a sad day when you have a 28% drop year over year and exceed Wall Street expectations. If I were in their shoes I would do whatever I had to do to attract consumers to put their hard earned cash back in my company even at the cost lower profitability sell for slight but sell morehey it works for Wal-Mart why not you to Coca-Cola. Until they transmit their investment and marketing strategies I would steer clear of investing in any new Coca-Cola stock for more than a few years.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.